The
Spread of Christianity in the Atlantic World
By
Darrin Crago
As
different European countries scrambled to explore the Atlantic world around
them, their travels led them to encounter many different races of people that
had been unknown to one another previously. Dynamic changes were induced with
this new mingling of race and culture during the time of exploration and empire
building. One major byproduct of the meeting and intermingling of the race and cultures
among the European, African, and indigenous tribes of the Americas over time,
resulted in the creation of a new mixed-race of Atlantic people. But it was not
just race- mixing that was going on, anywhere settlement sprung the inevitable
act of mixing occurred, giving way to many different variations of people through
these mixtures as well the concoction of culture and beliefs having many
variables as well. Christianity and Islam both had roots in Africa by the time
Europeans had reached the Americas, but my focus will be on Christianity in the
Atlantic World. I will discuss how Christianity was, from the dawn of
discovery, a driving factor in settlement and continued to be of importance
throughout the colonization of all the Americas not only to the Spanish but
also English slaveholders who found it important to indoctrinate their slaves
into Christianity. I will compare similarities and differences between the ways
Christianity was presented in the Atlantic world between these two forces of
change and show the similarities in the resistance of those they sought to
convert.
The
research I am using to discuss the Spanish conquest to convert souls in the
Indies include journal entries from Columbus and a letter from King Ferdinand
to the Taino-Arawak, these primary sources give sound evidence of the fact that
the church and crown both shared the view that conversions would be made. The
journal entry written by Columbus upon meeting the simple naked inhabitants of
this newly found world showed that introducing Christianity to any people
discovered was at the forefront of thought, he writes, “As I saw they were very
friendly to us, and perceived that they could be much more easily converted to
our holy faith by gentle means than by force. (Columbus) and in King Ferdinand’s
letter to the Taino- Arawak it is to be understood that they are giving them
the opportunity to convert to the Catholic faith, as many of their neighbors on
other islands already had. They were told if they comply with this then they
will have special privileges bestowed on them and their families and rights and
possessions will be protected, but if they did not, the promise from Ferdinand
was war from all sides through any means available they would then be enslaved
and sold off at the will of the king and that they would cause them as much
harm as possible in the process. (Ferdinand)
From the
time of Columbus’ second voyage on, priests and friars accompanied the ships
headed to the Indies to save souls. Another source I will be using throughout
my research is the “History of Latin America” written by Benjamin Keen and
Keith Haynes, it has given me a good look into the missions and what life was
like for the indigenous as well as the clergy themselves in these missions. The
Spanish example is important, as they are going in first with no real model
except for the conversions of the inquisition and a strong desire to do work in
the name of God as they saw it. There was a mixed school of thought when it
came to dealing with the pagan pasts of the natives some friars destroyed all
relics, idols, temples and picture- writings, while other friars believed that
to combat pagan practice they should first learn all they could about it.
(Keen)
In his work “ON THE TRAIL OF VOODOO: AFRICAN CHRISTIANITY IN
AFRICA AND THE AMERICAS” John K. Thorton suggests a “blending of African and
Christian elements” (Thorton) in creating an African Christianity. He accredits
this blending and transition to earlier conversions in a great deal of Africa
making it easy to comprehend, even if they had not yet been converted they most
likely would have been exposed to it. Thorton also gives credit to Catholicism
in these early conversions as the Protestants had little to do with the
development of Christianity in Africa. (Thorton) The pairing of African gods
with Christian saints made the church tolerant to the differences between the
two. The relevance of this writing for this first segment is the fact that the
Catholics are being given credit for the earlier conversions that took place in
Africa prior to Columbus’ discovery. This blending is an important factor
because not only does a blending take place with the indigenous in the Indies
but again with people of import throughout the Atlantic realm.
The use of Ira Berlins “From Creole
to African: Atlantic Creoles and the Origins of African-American Society in
North America” shows how Africans were progressed from “New Negro’s” to
assimilated African- Americans, through
processes that included stripping them of their identities and giving them new
names. This process of assimilation also includes a crash course in religion by
other slaves who were to talk to the new comers and tell them about Christ and
basically that this would be who they worshiped from now on. Everything that
could be done was done to break the spirit of the slave and acquire more
dominion over them. Berlin also brings up that Catholicism was moving into the
areas of trade in Africa prior to discovery, the Africans saw this as a way to
integrate with their trading partners, as well as with Islam to the north,
already setting into motion a blending of beliefs as although they did convert
they kept up with the old traditions as well.
As I mentioned earlier Christianity
and Islam both had roots in Africa at the time of Columbus’ discovery. So there
was prior knowledge of Christianity, some were already even converted in Africa
and for those who weren’t; they had most likely been exposed to the idea at
some point, or were somehow familiar with the concept. Commonalities between
Islam and Christianity helped hide the fact that many Islamic Africans held
onto their own beliefs without raising the suspicion of their keepers. Many of
the Islamic Africans were well educated and respected men in their homelands,
Sultana Afroz claims in her article “The Jihad
of 1831-1832: The Misunderstood Baptist Rebellion in Jamacia”, that 56.8
percent of the slave arrivals to Jamaica were from Muslim areas and that a
large percentage of these Muslims came from the intellectual elite. (Afroz) The
Muslims were able to build networks throughout and because of these learned
men, could, behind closed doors, meet and practice their own faith as well as
plot jihad.
So commonalities were found between
Islam and Christianity but there was also common ground to be shared with
tribal practices of Africans from still other regions who had not been exposed
to either of the previously mentioned beliefs that could be also be used to
mesh with Christianity. So the culture and religion that was exchanged between
communities across the Atlantic found itself perhaps starting off as one thing
but morphed into something different as worlds intertwined. Elizabeth Kiddy
explains how Our Lady of the Rosary bridged a gap between African beliefs being
brought to Brazil where Portuguese Catholicism was dominant, she writes, “She
became a cultural bridge between what the Africans had known in their native
lands and what they came to know in captivity.” (Kiddy)
Perhaps it can be said from the
information reviewed so far that the similarities between all of my examples
include people who change in accordance with what is going on around them to
benefit their stance or to continue their survival. In each case whether it be a
forced conversion performed by a Spanish clergyman on an Indian or a
transplanted African who in all the shuffle across the ocean is now being held
and told to believe a certain thing it is clear that they did it to appease
their captors or invaders to make their situation more bearable.
It looks like you have a good start to a paper in your first draft. The main issue I see with it is that you scholarly question isn't easily identifiable. I think you want to compare how Chritianity was brought to different people, Africans vs Native Americans but is there any established idea about this? It would be something like, "Was conversion effective for (insert converts here)?" or was conversion good or bad for the people being converted.
ReplyDeleteIf you want to talk about the spread of Christianity throughout the Atlantic World you could also talk about North America. I think there was a big difference between how Catholics and Protestants looked at converting Native Americans. It seems to me that Protestants were mostly looking for freedom themselves so their focus was more on securing their religious freedom than taking someone elses. For Catholicism you should be able to find the Papal Bull of Alexander VI that directed the conversion of the New World. I don't know of anything specific for Protestants but thre is probably something in respective colony charters that directs religious affairs. Either that or if you look at papers from the reformers, Calvin and Luther, they probably talk generally about spreading faith.
Right now I think you have a good amount of proof that Christianity was spread effectively to the southern part of the New World but it wasn't exactly like in Europe. I would also rrecommend looking at the different religious groups like the Jesuits that were formed to spread Catholicism and prevent Protestantism from spreading. Jesuit priests were a large part of converting Native Americans in the 16th-18th centurines.
Earnest question: do you think the Requerimiento can honestly be classified as an attempt at conversion, or was it strange men prattling Spanish at indigenous peoples? There's a good deal of contemporary argument about it, not least of which from de las Casas, and it may be a worthwhile investigation for your paper.
ReplyDelete