Religious
Freedom in the Atlantic World
Religious
freedom in the Atlantic world picked and choosed. Freemen of Europe were
allowed to come and practice their faith, escaping persecution and intolerance
in their old countries. Others less fortunate were in some cases forced to mask
their real beliefs and practice, for the sake of meeting the standard, what
they were told to believe and how to practice it.
Commonalities between Islam and Christianity
helped hide the fact that many Islamic Africans held onto their own beliefs without
raising the suspicion of their keepers. Many of the Islamic Africans were well
educated and respected men in their homelands, Sultana Afroz claims in her
article “The Jihad of 1831-1832: The
Misunderstood Baptist Rebellion in Jamacia”, that 56.8 percent of the slave
arrivals to Jamaica were from Muslim areas and that a large percentage of these
Muslims came from the intellectual elite. (Afroz.) The Muslims were able to
build networks throughout and because of these learned men, could, behind
closed doors, meet and practice their own faith as well as plot jihad.
Jews
also networked and quietly distributed themselves throughout port cities in
Portugal, Brazil, and the Netherlands. They worked themselves into positions of
influence and were able to gain acceptance, even when private Christian
citizens of the Dutch Reformed Church in Brazil attempted to have the Jews
privilege of retail trade revoked. The Estates General denied it and found that
the economic and military contributions of the Jews were vital. (Klooster)
Thorton
suggests a “blending of African and Christian elements” (Thorton) in creating
an African Christianity. He accredits this blending and transition to earlier
conversions in a great deal of Africa making it easy to comprehend, even if
they had not yet been converted they most likely would have been exposed to it.
Thoton also gives credit to Catholicism in these early conversions as the
Protestants had little to do with the development of Christianity in Africa. (Thorton)
The pairing of African gods with Christian saints made the church tolerant to
the differences between the two.
Forces
and people worked both for and against religious freedom in the Atlantic world.
Mixing, masking, and blending were the techniques used to retain their beliefs.
The commonality shared between beliefs enabled enslaved Africans to somewhat
survive as their own individuals under these circumstances.
References
1.
Sultana Afroz, “The Jihad of 1831-1832: The
Misunderstood Baptist Rebellion in Jamaica,” Journal of Muslim Minority
affairs, vol. 21, no. 2, 2001, p. 228
2.
Wim Klooster, “ Communities of Port Jews and Their
Contacts in the Dutch Atlantic World,” Jewish History (2006) pp.136-137
3.
John K. Thorton, “On the Trail of Voodoo:
African Christianity in Africa and the Americas,” The Americas, Vol.44. No. 3,
( Jan., 1988) p. 267
I like how you likened all three groups of people in regards to having to hide their religions. Jews seem to have gained more freedom by the end since they had economic influence and showed that they were devoted to their country. For the others I think it would be good to highlight how the slave owners attempted to squash any religious differences of the slaves. It would show how they had less freedom even though they were able to secretly believe what they wanted.
ReplyDelete